Comentários

I agree. Judges tend to be the problem in a lot of cases across the board in which many set precedents that destroy the rights of the common citizen such as laws that have eroded 4th amendment rights in NYC. It's acceptable that cops can search and seize your property using a crime that may have happened a mile away as probable cause. We should strengthen and expand civilian review boards so the PEOPLE can hold corrupt law enforcement accountable from cops to lawyers to judges.

It can't be done. There's too many, the whole system would fall apart as you are talking about at least 38% of the courts.

The government in my country follows all the worse examples of US system - corruption is the top idea imported recently from USA.

I was fooled twice and now I will fight to the end.

aho mitakuya oyasin....... meaning "we are all related" hence what is happining to those of us whom have been violated by the corruption of our legal system has a direct effect on all of us. Lawyers , Judges, law enforcement , CPS workers whom continue to participate in violating the very laws they are hired to protect shall one day see how much damage to thier own way of life it will effect for we are all related and every bit of real truth shall come to light .

If that "Prosecutor" was honest in doing his job,he would be murdered by the power of these judges! It would`nt be long before he/she would be taking bribes themselves in order to secure their future and their LIVES! It would take a whole panel of "Honest People" to have ANY chance of success! It is easier to bribe/threaten 1, than it is many!

Judges are (for the most part)lawyers that have received enough money (mostly through bribes and payoffs) to rise to the position of "Honorable" Judge! I can tell you from personal experience that ANY judge WILL sell justice,like a whore sells sex on a street corner,especially when politics are involved! 15,000 innocent people are convicted in this country every year due to many reasons,some of which are judicial.Recall the Duke LaCrosse team.If not for the media,those boys WOULD be in prison.

Honestly there is no 1 on american soil that can stop the u.s. goverment....

go to the florida jail 4 judges . org and sign the petition

Keep up the Good & Righteous Fight, Brother. People who think that truth and justice are effected in our courtrooms are ignorant, naive fools. Most cops, & lying lawyers, (especially lying prosecutor lawyers & lying judge lawyers) are criminals. We all know that lawyers are lying SOBs and yet we keep voting for them at the polls. We need to wise up!

I have a lot of experience with local judges and lawyers who seemingly are able to trample due process rights and rules. the Supreme Court accepts UNsigned orders! They are all corrupt

hi, i am a card-carry republican and also a card-carry Hispanic . yeah! your right, there should be a special Prosecutor for corrupt judges, because frankly to put the national destiny in the hands of one person, is a receipt for for bad government like Mexico, thanks 4 yr time, i will hit up congress women Ms " demorat" linda Sanchez's

hi, i am a card-carry republican and also a card-carry Hispanic . yeah! your right, there should be a special Prosecutor for corrupt judges, because frankly to put the national destiny in the hands of one person, is a receipt for for bad government like Mexico, thanks 4 yr time, i will hit up congress women Ms " demorat" linda Sanchez's

please check for brain damage

Now a link posted at TMZ

No evidentiary hearing is necessary but to suggest that you can deprive one party of the right to be heard at the time you eliminate their right to trial is wrong. Surely that is not what hersko0 really meant. Maybe a response will be imminent from that quarter.

A summary judgment hearing in Florida is with affidavits, certified copies and documents admissible premised on testimony as reflected in the affidavits. It is not and should not be an evidentiary hearing as it is to determine if there is a need to allow further proceedings. All filings, if proper, are construed in favor of the opposing party and against the position that there is no true controversy implicit in the moving party's motion.

yes but if the facts are undisputed then the facts have to be treated as true. If the facts are disputed then it has to be set down for an evidentiary hearing, which is generally not done.

"... Respondent's argument clearly demonstrates his failure to understand that the right to be heard is not limited to only being heard in person. The right is preserved by permitting a party to submit his or her position in writing." Ridiculous, pathetic and an indictment-catalyst.

This is a clear indicia of more than problems in the jurisdiction [Florida] whose seven justices tolerated this becoming the law of the case to cover up prior criminal conduct of two and maybe three trial judges: See the next post for the quote and the final comment